I still can't quite reconcile this idea that the 07 is a 250/350lc for the 21st century. It's fast and light, and all that, but that's where it ends for me. Someone said it was because it's also cheap, but it's not lc cheap. In their heyday, the LC's were almost all owned by 17 - 25 year olds - the 250s were for a while learner legal.
The median age for the 07 seems to be well over 30. No teenager is ever going to be able to insure one either.
I've though of an alternative comparison, and I can't find too many holes in the argument. Well, apart from the number of wheels, but we can let that slip.
Drum roll . . . the Ford Mustang.
The Ford Mustang was developed to be an affordable sports car. It was faster than most comparable cars, but not supercar fast. It was launched as a pretty basic car, with few frills, for a killer price. Lots of extras could be specified, or bought afterwards.
They sold like hot cakes, and there were long waiting lists for them.
They did of course go on to be a classic. That remains to be seen.
Is this a reasonable comparison? I'm quite happy with the idea of driving a 2 wheeled Mustang.
The median age for the 07 seems to be well over 30. No teenager is ever going to be able to insure one either.
I've though of an alternative comparison, and I can't find too many holes in the argument. Well, apart from the number of wheels, but we can let that slip.
Drum roll . . . the Ford Mustang.
The Ford Mustang was developed to be an affordable sports car. It was faster than most comparable cars, but not supercar fast. It was launched as a pretty basic car, with few frills, for a killer price. Lots of extras could be specified, or bought afterwards.
They sold like hot cakes, and there were long waiting lists for them.
They did of course go on to be a classic. That remains to be seen.
Is this a reasonable comparison? I'm quite happy with the idea of driving a 2 wheeled Mustang.