Ralph
New member
Wouldn't surprise me at all, there seems to be new interest in the 250/300 market.
Gaz2212
New member
only too big if you want to track and race but why would you buy into the mt range for race
for normal road use 99% of people will use it not a problem at all
for normal road use 99% of people will use it not a problem at all
D
Deleted member 20
Guest
Quick look at the specs and some guesswork:
MT125 and R125 share all chassi dimensions, both fitted with 100/80 + 130/70 tires, have 11.5 L tank, fully wet 140 kg and 142 kg, both in ABS version.
R3 has 321cc 42hp 180° crank twin, fitted with 110/70 + 140/70 tires, has 14 L tank, fully wet 169 kg in ABS version.
The MT3 ABS sharing engine/chassi with R3 would then be 167 kg fully wet.
The MT125 is 25 kg lighter than the MT3 (taking feul tank into the equation).
The MT3 is 15 kg lighter than the MT07.
MT125 and R125 share all chassi dimensions, both fitted with 100/80 + 130/70 tires, have 11.5 L tank, fully wet 140 kg and 142 kg, both in ABS version.
R3 has 321cc 42hp 180° crank twin, fitted with 110/70 + 140/70 tires, has 14 L tank, fully wet 169 kg in ABS version.
The MT3 ABS sharing engine/chassi with R3 would then be 167 kg fully wet.
The MT125 is 25 kg lighter than the MT3 (taking feul tank into the equation).
The MT3 is 15 kg lighter than the MT07.
robodene
New member
I was discussing the MT-07 and 'MT-320' (MT-03?) with my local dealer and he said it was "Imminent". That's good, I thought; give it a while to shake down and I'll have one when I have to finish with my 03 for lower weight reasons.
Last edited: